fired? the interview solution – part 1

August 19th, 2010 by Judi

job hunt problems 4So you were fired? Now what? How will you explain it when you interview? 

There are many questions that plague job seekers. “What salary are you looking for?” is a big one. “Why should we hire you?” is another. And “Why did you leave your last job?” can leave you spluttering and on the defensive if you were fired and don’t know how to answer. 

And most people don’t!  After they’ve stumbled through a few answers—trying in vain to phrase it in an acceptable way—and are not invited back for a second interview, their fears are confirmed. No one will hire them because they’ve been fired. 

Except that’s not what’s really happening. The problem is not that they were fired, but how they answered the question. 

We don’t stay at a job our entire lives like most of our grandparents did. Not only is it common to change jobs, some believe it’s the best way to leverage salary and career. While most of the changes may be of your own volition, odds are a few will involve being fired or laid-off. 

Companies are bought out, merged, and consolidated, which means inevitably there’s a duplication of staff. It can be as simple as the new president wanting to bring in his own team. He probably didn’t even look at your capabilities; he just decided you were …outta there.

These departures aren’t as difficult to explain. You can say:

  • “Our company was bought and the entire department was eliminated.” (It’s not me; a bunch of us were asked to leave.) Safety in numbers.
  • “The new president wanted to bring in his own guy. I lasted about a week.” (It’s not me; the president didn’t even take the time to find out if I was good at what I do.) A prospective company can’t possibly hold something against you that’s so… impersonal.
  • “The company was losing money and downsized.” (It’s not me; if the company had been profitable, I’d still be there!)  

The common thread is, “It’s not me.” Therefore, I am not flawed, unwanted, performing poorly, or any other reason you can think up or worry about.  But these types of partings, while they seem impersonal, can still have a detrimental effect. We’ll get to that in a minute. 

The instances that cause real damage feel very personal, even when they aren’t. You are the only one who was dismissed, and what’s more, you know they’ll replace you. You’re caught off guard, angry, and frightened, too. In an instant, you’re on the defensive, which is usually where people remain.  And that’s exactly what causes the problem. 

Firing isn’t always about the individual, even though that’s who’s impacted the most.  Sometimes it’s about the boss—especially bosses with issues. It might be about poor performance, but that’s not always negative. It could be the result of having different philosophies. For instance, the company may value those who work weekends, nights and holidays. You prefer to balance your life. 

Once you’re fired, you can’t change the circumstances. But you can control how you view them. While departmental or company-wide layoffs are easier to explain, they can also cause damage. You wonder, “If I’d been really good, wouldn’t they have found another spot for me?” In addition, you’re in an insecure place that sometimes is difficult to adjust to.

Take time to clear some tears or anger. If you’re tempted to recoil, rehash, threaten revenge or otherwise communicate with your previous employer, don’t.  Remember one word: reference! Don’t burn your bridges. Leave the company gracefully 

Most importantly, detach yourself from the event and honestly examine what happened. That’s the only way you’re going to get any insight and begin adjusting your thoughts and perspective.  

PART TWO:   I’ll tell you how to handle it, so that you can answer the question with grace, rather than fear. (August 30 or 31.  I’m on vacation next week.  No computer. No cell phone.  Sweet!)

don’t rationalize rude behavior – part 2

August 11th, 2010 by Judi

rudeAt some level, we know that actions speak louder than words, yet I see job seekers failing to remember that, all because they’re so desperate for a job.  But when you’re interviewing and see poor behavior on the part of the hiring authority, don’t excuse it.  Small things are indicative of bigger things.  Instead of rationalizing their behavior or attempting to understand it, just seriously reconsider working there.

Here’s another example that happened to me while I was marketing myself. 

 There’s a daily paper – with terrible journalism – the next town over.  The editor (let’s call him John) didn’t return my call three times, so I contacted the publisher, who immediately sent me an email saying he’d touch base with the editor and get back with me.  The next day I spoke with someone who knew the editor and told me he was an “arrogant jerk.” 

The publisher of the trade magazine for which I write, sold newspaper ads earlier in his career.  After two years of repeated sales calls on a major car dealership; he finally got them to sign an advertising contract.  It was for a full-page, 4-color ad in all 5 of the company’s newspapers and the dealership had agreed to a regular Sunday schedule.  Major revenue for the newspaper group. 

He – I’ll call him Greg –  flies back to the office and gets the ad in just in time for the Sunday edition. 

The editor, John, now the editor of the horrible paper the next town over from me, threatens to stop the presses and pull the ad because inserting it caused the presses to run three minutes late. Greg, their top sales person, had been tired of this kind of behavior for a while, and at this point, was so disgusted, he quit.

The real issue, of course, was that John was a control freak and used that event to throw his weight around and exert the authority of his title.  That kind of behavior is indicative of someone who is insecure, probably a micro manages, and unable to say to an employee, “Good idea!  Let’s use it!” He’s likely to overturn or steal any good idea that is someone else’s and doesn’t put him – he feels – in a good light.

You can see the consistency of John’s behavior from then to now, where as the editor of the paper in the small town next to me, he’s not bothering to return my calls.

I did receive an email from his publisher which said they wouldn’t “have the ability to determine the value of the offer” for a couple weeks, but I was welcome to follow up then if I wanted to.  But since I’d have to deal with John, the editor, I replied I was withdrawing my offer and was no longer interested in working with them.  .   

At 25, Greg was the top sales person when John, late 30s, was editor of that small town newspaper that went to press 3 minutes late.  Then Greg became publisher of the largest trade magazine in that trade’s industry for 12 years.  Circulation is 150,000.  In about a week he’ll likely be Sales Director of Events for one of the largest sports magazines in the country.  

John is still an editor of a small, local newspaper, now for a town 74,500 which means circulation is a smaller number.  And the number of people in the town is half the size of the magazine for which Greg was a publisher for 12 years.  Everyone’s been advancing, but 15 years later, the only thing Barry has done is gone from one small newspaper to another.

I could tell you hundreds of stories like these from my 22 years of being a recruiter, cold calling companies, encountering rude behavior, and subsequently learning from people who had left of the company’s high turnover and the upper level management’s egregious personality.

Behavior is telling.  Overblown egos cause problems for everyone around the egoist.  They cause problems to the person with the ego, but you can be sure that person has no idea that their ego is what’s causing the problems.  They tend to be micro managers, or they want to put people down and lock them into a place where the employee is always seeking praise, or they’re dismissive and not available, etc.  They’re just bad news.

And here’s the clincher – most of the time, because like types attract like types – a good part of the organization is like that.  Except for the employees who are happy to have a job and put up with it.

There is no reason that you, as a job seeker, should be on the defensive, trying to please every hiring authority you meet.  There is no reason why you should learn interview styles in order to handle someone whose interview style is rude, abusive, and interrogatory.  There is no reason you should stumble to find the right answer trying to fit yourself into the position they want to fill, thus trying to ingratiate yourself with someone who is obviously a seriously dysfunctional person.  they’re like that in the interview, they’ll be even worse as a boss.

Blow them off and go in a different direction.  In fact, you have my permission to leave the interview early if you want to.  Just stand up and say politely, “Thank you, but I think that perhaps this company is not the place for me.  I appreciate your time,” and leave.

Life’s too short to put up with jerks.  Laugh, count your blessings for having the wisdom to let it go by, and go forward!

don’t rationalize rude behavior – part 1

August 6th, 2010 by Judi

rudeIn order to get a job, people will rationalize red flags and  fail to make a connection between an isolated event or two and the much larger picture.    I saw this often as a recruiter when I asked candidates questions about their previous jobs.    I see it now with my clients – or people who send me emails – when they are clearly taking something  just to take something,and I counsel them against moving forward in the process and why that is.

These same red flags show up for me too.  That’s because we’re all marketing ourselves in one way or another.    You – the job seekers -  with your resume and cover letter, and me through various means in order to reach more job seekers. 

Although writing and speaking opportunities find me, I also look for them: ezines, newspapers, authors and journalists that might be interested in quoting me or carrying my articles.

One of the reasons I so actively advocate following up is because having been a straight-commission, top-producing sales person who earned my living building relationships with people, I know how important following up is and why it’s necessary.  And I know the frustrations of it, too.  I also know from experience that the red flag is relative to the person, and have nothing to do with me.

When I make a cold call, first I inquire. Then I follow up.  By then, usually I have a dialogue started because the person to whom I’m inquiring gets back with me.  If not, I follow up a third time, and a fourth.   I repeat the reason for calling.  I refresh their memory as to my earlier communications.  I mention that I’ve left a few messages.  I’m always polite.  By the last time, I specifically say I’ve left several messages and would they please take a few minutes to call me back?  So they have to actively and consciously decide not to do that.  It’s not as if they’ve forgotten who I am.

Truthfully, by the fourth time, I’m more interested in just seeing what happens.  I’m not really expecting anything and not sure that if the opportunity presents itself at that point that I even want to pursue it any longer.  The lack of professionalism some people exhibit is astounding.

You have this happen all the time.  You follow up on a resume.  Nothing.  You speak with a recruiter, and then can never get a hold of them again.  They promised to call you about a great opportunity.  Nothing.  You schedule a meeting.  The person doesn’t show up or was called away.  You follow up on an interview.  No return call.

Rude, rude, and rude.  Them, not you.

I don’t care who they are.  I’ve read about singers, movie stars, and even the President, who make a point of answering every letter they receive, although they’re generally form letters sent by people hired to do that.  I’ve called CEOs of large corporations or hospitals, and although I might not speak with them immediately or ever, the admin assistant  phones back.  

The point is that the contact was acknowledged.  Who has such a big ego, or is so busy that they can’t take a minute to even delegate that task to someone?  It leaves me shaking my head in wonder.

Let’s put this statement “them, not you” into perspective.  When I’m selling various newspapers around the U.S. on carrying my column, I share that I was syndicated for 2 years in over 300 major metropolitan markets until they changed their format.  I mention I’ve been a Sunday columnist for the New Haven (CT) Register for four years, and that I’ve written over 50 articles for a trade magazine with which I used to be associated. 

Generally, I’m received enthusiastically and so newspapers around the US are carrying my columns for free in return for my ability to reach more job seekers.  (With newspapers having trouble, they often assign an editor or a reporter to do their columns, so asking for payment would be pointless). 

Yet, with my local paper, a small weekly one, the editor had to talk to the board, and the board, which convenes once per month, would have to vote on it.  The editor forgot to bring it up and after several conversations, it wasn’t worth it.  They’ve gone through several editors since then.  Gee – what  surprise.

Part 2 – an incredible example of a jerk and what all this means to you.  Look for it next week.

it all begins in your head part 2

July 30th, 2010 by Judi

in your headPart 1 is below this entry.

Last entry I showed you how and why your thoughts, verbalizations, and intents create what you experience. To quote Mark Twain: “If you think you can, you can. If you think you can’t, you’re right.”  So if you don’t like what’s happening with your job search, look to how you’re thinking and what you’re saying about the process, because your ability to find the perfect job is determined by your attitude and beliefs.            

Those who are determined to find their perfect job know what it looks like and know it’s out there.  Their paperwork invites interest.  They sell themselves in a compelling manner.  They know what they’re looking for.  They eliminate anything that doesn’t fit and doggedly pursue what does.            

By contrast, there are those who would rather play victim.  “There’s nothing out there.”  “I’m never going to find something that pays what I make now.”  “I’ve been unemployed so long I’m going to lose my house!”  “I got fired; I’ll never find a job now.”  And after multiple interviews and no offers, comes the wail that perpetuates the situation:  “No one’s going to hire me!”           

It’s no coincidence that this group hasn’t made sure their cover letter and resume are eye-catching and worth reading, nor are they pro-active in their search.  And because they don’t know what they want, they’re interviewing – and trying to get an offer – for any job that seems reasonable.  They’re sending out blurry, vague intent.  What do they expect back?          

So if your search isn’t producing the desired results, how do you change it?   You change your thinking.  When you change your thinking, you change your intent, and what you say and do is a reflection of that.            

Ever hear those lottery stories? Sometimes a family member or friend says, “He always said he’d win one day!” And then there’s the other side of that train of thought: “Oh, I play the lottery sometimes. But I never win!” When you think like that you might as well save your money, because you never will win.            

By paying attention to your words and thoughts, you’ll begin to notice where you’re creating, perpetuating, and accepting negative energy, not only in your job search, but your daily existence.  And then you can begin to make choices that create different results.  The shorter the gap between your thoughts and the appearance of what you’re thinking about, the better you are at creating.           

Pay attention to the words of other people that, out of habit, you agree with.  Every time you say, think, or hear something negative, don’t accept it.  Counter with the positive.  

  • “Watch me screw this up” becomes “I choose to pay attention and do the best I can.  If I make a mistake I’ll learn from it.”
  • Change “What a lousy day!” to “This rain makes everything so beautifully green!”
  • Don’t over dramatize a situation.  When you catch yourself saying “I lost my keys again! I’m so stupid!” replace it with “No, I’m not stupid, but sometimes I’m forgetful, so I’ll create a specific place to put my keys, and I’ll know where they are.”         

Simplified, it’s about choice.  Things are what they are.  You can choose to change what’s happening or change your attitude about what’s happening.  It takes practice to stay conscious.  But until you begin to make your choices conscious, you won’t realize how many of them have been unconscious.   And if you’re not paying attention to that, you’re not aware of the consequences or benefits that come with each choice.            

Only you are responsible for your life and where you are right now.  You made the choices, and you created it.  If you’re on a job search and aren’t satisfied with what’s taking place, no matter how outlandish this topic seems, why not choose a different approach?  You just might find your perfect job!

it all begins in your head – part 1

July 22nd, 2010 by Judi

in your head2Frank Lloyd Wright, world-famous architect, said, “The thing always happens that you really believe in; and the belief in a thing makes it.”

In other words, we create our own reality by what we think.   For a huge number of people, this is a tough concept to accept, because it means acknowledging responsibility for their circumstances.   Too many people would rather play the victim, preferring to believe they have no control over the events in their lives.  And that’s a fallacy.

We’re all familiar with the Golden Rule, Karma (which is both bad and good), and the saying, “You reap what you sow.” These are simpler and more familiar versions of The Law of Attraction and ones we quote so often we’ve lost the impact of their full meaning.

Thoughts, intents and verbalizations are energy, and energies tend to group together.  They attract each other. It’s the same concept as social clubs, country clubs, school cliques, and friendships.  Like types attract like types.  

Everything is energy, but let’s focus just on humans and the thought process.  Your thoughts project energy, your words create it, and your moods are suffused with it.

Do you recognize yourself in any of these automatic statements?  “Pretty good for a Monday.” “It’s going all right…so far.”  “Why do I always lose things!”  “Watch me mess this up.”  “I’ll never find a parking place!”  “I managed to do it – for a change!”  “I hate finding a new job!”  “Interviewing is so difficult!”

Negative statements of intent float around and find other negative energies, and they attach.  Eventually they come back to you, resulting in parts of your life always seeming to be a mess.  You lose your wallet.  You botch something important.  You drive around the parking lot increasingly frustrated.  You receive no invitations to interview.  You find yourself saying (frequently) “Why does this always happen to me?”

So when it comes to thoughts and intent, instead of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out), it’s the reverse: GOGI.  

But you don’t have to accept what you’re getting back.  You have the power of choice and you can choose to change what you’re putting out there.  As Maya Angelou said, “If you don’t like something, change it.  If you can’t change it, change your attitude.” 

Recently I received an email from a Project Manager with 20 years of experience who’s working full time and finishing his Bachelor’s.  He has to find a new job.  He wondered if not having a degree would be held against him and would he get any interviews?   He won’t if he continues to focus on a perceived defect. 

 On the other hand, he’s been successful with several companies, is finishing his degree and holding down a job while going to school.  That’s three positives instead of one negative. 

And while he’s at it, he should look for a company that measures results by experience instead of a piece of paper.  Change your viewpoint, change your thinking, change your plan.  Your belief in yourself changes, thus your reality changes.  The domino effect.  Suddenly you’re interviewing with companies who believe success is determined by experience, not a degree, and they’re interested in learning more about you.

The energy of intent gives you the ability to create your perfect job. Because then your subconscious looks for ways to create what you know is there.   You generate ideas with optimism that before wouldn’t have made it to the surface – or if they had, they’d have been dismissed. You think, “Why not?” instead of “That will never work.”

And you look for ways to make your perfect job happen.  You do your homework so you know what it is and what it looks like.  You search is pro-active with a laser-like focus.  You know that you’ll find it, because you won’t accept anything less.

 Next time: part 2 – how you can learn to change the way you think.

keywords and resumes: don’t miss the point

July 15th, 2010 by Judi

keywordsKeywords.  The very phrase is enough to freak job seekers out.  “Does my resume have enough?” “Is there any such thing as too many?”  “Should I change it for every ad?”  Conventional wisdom says a resounding YES for the last question.  Consequently, job seekers end up with multiple resumes.  The average number is 4.  This week I had someone come to me with 8.  Absurd. (And they were all poorly done, too)

Job seekers want to know what hiring authorites think.  Since I’ve worked with hundreds of them over 22 years – I’ll tell you.  They want to know your story.  But first, they want to know if your story is worth their time.  

Unfortunately, job seekers and professional resume writers think keywords are more important than - and will substitute for - the story.  Too often the keywords are there and the story is missing.

First, the principle behind keywords is screening.  Even in times of average unemployment there are people who apply for a job becuase they think they can do it, they’re willing to learn it, they did something like it……but they haven’t actually done it or anything close to it.  When the unemployment rate soars – like now – the percentage of unqualified people soars.  Keywords – or rather, the absence of keywords – weeds these people out. 

Second, lately “professional” resume writers like to just plop a huge group of keywords somewhere on top of the resume, and tell you this is good….because they’re getting all your keywords in there!  But more often than not, that section is overdone and takes up space.  Keywords should be present in your resume via a STRENGTHS section on top but more importantly, used naturally throughout the resume within context of your career.

Third, resumes in general are usually poorly written and that includes many by ”professional” writers who proclaim their CRW (certified resume writer) status makes them an expert while they may just be looking at a bunch of different books and repeating what someone taught them.  But keywords don’t take the place of a poorly written resume, and 99.9% of self -done resumes are horribly ineffective while many professional ones aren’t always much better.

Where does the story come in?  A well-written resume isn’t a  list of your employers and what you did in each place.  Nor is it a brag sheet.  Rather, it tells the story of who you are,  what you can do, how you’ve made a difference, how you’ve grown, how you make decisions, what your level of motivation is – all within the context of your career.  The companies for whom you’ve worked and what you’ve done there – typically boring job d escription stuff – is the least of it.  With or without the keywords. 

My point is – if your resume is well written, and tells your story thoroughly and effectively, both general and specific keywords will be present because it’s pretty hard to present your career without keywords.  So on some level, it’s even difficult to write a resume poorly and not use applicable key words.  

If you’re a medical device sales person,  can you write a resume that doesn’t mention any of the following  relevant to what you’ve done: medical device; territory; accounts; capital equipment, disposables, or both; physicians (and relevant specialty); the applicable hospital department….etc

If you’re an IT project manager, common sense says you list the hardware, software, and programs that you’ve experience with and whatever experience you focused on.  You may have a poorly written bullet that’s a job description:  Negotiated with vendors to procure best prices for hardware, software, and services or you may have a more effective, accomplishment-oriented bullet that tells how you benefited the company:  Saved company over $15k by renegotiating vendor contracts as they came up for renewal.  Either way – you’ve got negotiate with vendors in there.

What if you don’t have the experience? Then it’s very difficult to use the primary keywords, and you have to find something you did that’s parallel, utilizing general keywords.  If you’re answering an ad for wholesale sales of men’s clothing but your experience is in wholesale furnishings, the primary keywords won’t fit – no matter how hard you try.  Your experience isn’t in selling men’s clothing wholesale.  So you better have bullets that relate not just your sales awards, but how you sell, if you build relationships, what your methodology and philosophy is.  Although again, here is mostly where there’s only a job description and a list of sales awards.  Something like

  • Sold home furnishings to Fortune 500 companies and developed key accounts.
  • Took territory from last place to first place  2008
  • 2 sales person of 25 for northeast region
  • Cold called to develop new accounts

Keywords?  men’s clothing, wholesale, Fortune 500, sales, territory, new accounts, cold call, key accounts.  Good, right?  Nope.  No story.  How do you sell? How did evolve the territory?  If it was a new market base for you, how did you learn it?  What was your selling method of cold calls to developing accounts? Who were your clients? What problems did you solve for them?

Do you see the correlation? The worry about keywords is not only overhyped and overdone, but misplaced.  Keywords are about experience.  And if you’ve got the experience, you’ve got the keywords.  The real job – and the most effective use of keywords – is to make sure those keywords tell your story and your story encompasses the keywords.  Without the full context, keywords might get you past the the first few cuts, but if your resume can’t substantiate your story and leaves it untold, you may not get past a phone screen.  If your interview skills aren’t well developed, no matter how many keywords are on your resume, keywords alone won’t carry you through.

21 things hiring managers want you to know (with added commentary)

July 6th, 2010 by Judi

interview 4by Alison Green
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Copyrighted, U.S.News & World Report, L.P. All rights reserved

Alison Green has written an excellent article.  It echoes stuff I’ve been saying and teaching my clients for ages.  Having spent 22 years working with hundreds of hiring authorities, it’s no surprise to me or my clients.  And yet, you’ll hear others tell you differently.  I’ve made a few comments for many of the points.

We actually want you to be honest.
I see too many job applicants who approach the interview as if their only goal is to win a job offer, losing sight of the fact that this can land them in the wrong job. Think of it like dating. This means being honest about your strengths and weaknesses and giving the hiring manager a glimpse of the real you, so he or she can make an informed decision about how well you’d do in the job.

You are unique and each company is unique.  You do  yourself no favors by trying to get the job at any cost, despite what others will teach you.  For starters, if you don’t know what you want and take the time to find out if they’re what you want, you may find out you’re miserable, only it will be too late.  Additionally, honestly should be paramount.  You don’ t have to bleed all over everyone, but don’t try to hide or change things to protect yourself and make the interviewer like you better.

We pay attention to the small stuff.
Frequently, I see candidates act as if only “official” contacts—like interviews and formal writing samples—count during the hiring process. They’ll send flawless cover letters and then check up on their applications with sloppily written E-mails with spelling errors. Or they’ll be charming and polite to me but rude to an assistant. I pay attention to how quickly a candidate responds to requests for writing samples and references, and even how fast he or she returns phone calls.

“Small things telling…” I had a client once who did a retainer for one month.  Squeezed it like a sponge – that’s okay.  That’s what I’m here for.  The program can be done in two months, but he made it through only about 1/3 of it.  Jovial, jolly, friendly – didn’t do a thing without asking me my opinion.  At the end of one month, he cut loose.  Hardly answered my emails and when he did, he was brusque.  Didn’t want to comment on what he’d learned because he hadn’t gotten a job yet.  Very unimpressive behavior.  I can’t imagine he’s very pleasant to work for.  

We want you to ask questions.
I encounter many candidates who don’t have many—or even any—questions when I ask what I can answer for them. Your interviewer wants to know that you’re interested in the details of the job, the department, your prospective supervisor’s management style, and the culture of the organization. Otherwise, you risk signaling that you’re either not that interested or just haven’t thought very much about it.

Not only have you not thought very much about this job, this interview, this company, but you haven’t thought much about your career, the next step, ot in what kind of company you are most happy or to which you can contribute.  Your career is reactive.  No one wants to hire someone like that.

We’d like a thank-you note right away.
E-mail is fine for this and has the advantage of arriving faster, but handwritten notes are still appreciated (and are increasingly unusual so will stand out). And if there are multiple interviews, send a thank-you note each time.

There is no excuse for not writing a thank you note.  Not only is it rude for not expressing appreciation for the time they spent with you, but you’ve missed a valuable opportunity to sell yourself by reinterating why you’re right for the job or clearing up a point that perhaps was left hanging.

We’re hoping for some enthusiasm.
Commonly, job seekers are too worried about looking desperate. It doesn’t look desperate to express your interest in the job or check in to ask about the hiring timeline. However, enthusiasm does cross the line if you are calling more than once a week, calling earlier than the date they said they’d get back to you, sounding like you’re eager to take any job as opposed to this one in particular, or appearing as if this is the only option you have.

When you’re searching for a job, enthusiasm is a good thing. But some job applicants cross the line from enthusiastic and proactive to obnoxiously aggressive—and, in doing so, kill their chances at a job offer. You have crossed the line if you are doing any of the following: Checking on the status of your application daily; calling and hanging up when you get voice mail, over and over; cold-calling numerous employees in the same company.

Desperation does not breed objectivity.  Companies want to be liked for who they are – because you know what you want and you’ve spotted it in them.  Just like you want them to like you for you.  And be truthful – who are you more excited to have lunch with – the old friend who is hugely excited to run into you? Or the one who didn’t crack a smile once and had little to say?

We need to know your real weaknesses.
Claiming that your biggest weakness is perfectionism and you work too hard is disingenuous. It looks like you’re avoiding the question. Candidates who can’t or won’t come up with a realistic assessment of areas where they could improve make me think they’re lacking in insight and self-awareness—or, at a minimum, just making it impossible to have a real discussion of their potential fitness for the job. I want to know about your weaknesses not because I’m trying to trip you up, but because I genuinely care about making sure you’re a good fit for the job.

It’s not a trick question.  Let’s go back to every company is unique and every person is unique.  Your job isn’t to get the job at any cost, it’s to find out if you’re right for them and they’re right for you.  It also shows maturity and self – awareness.

You should address being overqualified in your cover letter.
If you don’t acknowledge it, we’re afraid that you’ll be bored, that you don’t understand the position, that the salary will be too low for you. We need to hear things like: “At this stage in my career, having a job I enjoy is more important to me than salary. I have no problem earning less than I have in the past.” Or, “I want to move into this field, and I know that I need to start at a lower level in order to do that.” Or, “I wouldn’t take a job I’m not excited about.”

Don’t even get me started on this one.  Candidates tend to think a company should be eager to get someone with strong experience and all those skills.  But they’re thinking from their own viewpoint – not the hiring authority’s.  I’ve got a special report on this very topic.  It’s a good six pages long and will tell you just how to deal with it

Your resume objective usually hurts you.
Your resume gets tossed when it lists an objective totally unrelated to the position I have open. Really, just get rid of the objective altogether. It rarely helps, often hurts, and always takes up valuable real estate that could be better used to showcase your accomplishments. If you want to talk about your career objective and how this position fits it, use the cover letter for that.

An objective shouldn’t be on there at all.  It doesn’t inform, it’s all about you, and it’s selling you short in multiple ways, including the one in the above paragraph.  Job finding is a skill.  Sometimes it’s just common sense.  If you went into a store and asked for running shoes,  what would your reaction be if the salesperson brought you basketball sneakers?  Same thing.  Use your head.   It’s one of the many reasons why you’re sending out resumes and not getting any response.

The phone interview is not a casual chat.
While the interviewer wants to get a sense of your personality, a phone interview is still an interview, not an informal phone call with a friend. Don’t sound stiff, but don’t use the same tone you’d use to talk about your date last night. I’ve phone-interviewed candidates who I’m pretty sure were lounging on the couch, watching the game with the sound down, and snacking while we talked.

Have your resume in front of you, smile when you speak, and be somewhere it’s quiet where you won’t be interrupted.  Anything else and your sabotaging yourself.   Your job is to get in the door because that’s where you get the meat of the information about the company.  The phone interview is for the company to decide if they like you or not and if they want to bring you in for a face-to-face.  You can’t get what you need on the phone interview, so you should be focused single mindedly on helping that decision be a “yes.”

You shouldn’t count on our job offer.
Whatever you do, don’t let up on your job search, no matter how confident you are that an offer is coming. Things change; other candidates come along; plans for the position evolve or even get canceled. Until you have a firm offer in hand, you have to proceed as if you don’t, since ultimately you can control only your side of the process—so keep setting up those other interviews.

But it happens.  That’s because people hate job searching so they tend to delude themselves and be pretty sure they have it in the bag.  And then when they don’t get the  offer…..they’ve lost all that time.  Don’t learn the hard way.  It ain’t over til the fat lady sings – or in other words, until you have an offer in writing and a start date set.

We may check references beyond your list.
Simply not listing that person as a reference isn’t enough; Reference-checkers can call anyone you’ve worked for or who might know you, even if they aren’t on the list you provide. In fact, smart reference-checkers will make a point of calling people not on your list, because presumably you’ve only listed the people most likely to present you in the best light.

I did this all the time as a recruiter, especially a contingency recruiter because I focused on a specific industry or narrow geographic area and thus knew all the players.  When I did construction, I knew the subs.  It wasn’t uncommon for me to do twice as many “unofficial” references as “official” ones.  Sometimes I got mixed info or had a hunch and had to chase things down.  But that was what my clients expected so I made sure I knew the real scoop. 

Some of us actually care about candidates.
One of the biggest complaints I hear from job seekers who write to me at Ask a Manager is about companies that don’t respond to job applicants: no rejection, nothing. Personally, I think it’s inexcusable—throughout the hiring process, but particularly after a company has engaged with an applicant in some way, like a phone interview or an in-person interview. It’s callous and dismissive and lacks any appreciation for the fact that the candidate is anxiously waiting to hear an answer—any answer—and keeps waiting and waiting, long after a decision has been made.

I agree.  It’s egregious.  But see above….”small things telling.”  Would it kill them, especially in this day and age, to cut and paste (or whatever) a stock response so that people have closure?  The worst one is the new thing of companies not hiring unemployed people (see my previous blog post).    

You can gain an edge with your cover letter.
Individualize. Yes, it takes a lot longer than sending out the same form letter over and over, but a well-written cover letter that’s obviously individualized to a specific opening is going to open doors when your resume alone might not have. These account for such a tiny fraction of applications that you’ll stand out and immediately go to the top of my pile. And I’ll give you an extra look, even if your resume isn’t stellar.

Don’t get me started on this one either!  I say and say and say til I’m blue in the face “Don’t send a generic cover letter.”  The ad is the company telling you what they want.  Why do so many people ignore it?  It’s not about what you want to say, it’s about what they want to hear….and make it truthful when you tell them.

You can be too early to the interview.
Many interviewers are annoyed when candidates show up more than five or ten minutes early, since they may feel obligated to interrupt what they’re doing and go out to greet the person, and some (like me) feel vaguely guilty leaving someone sitting in their reception area that long. Aim to walk in five minutes early, but no more than that.

You many need a job, but don’t make it look like you don’t have a life.  Plus, it’s not as impressive as you might think.

You can leave the subjective descriptions off the resume.
Your resume is for experience and accomplishments only. It’s not the place for subjective traits, like “great leadership skills” or “creative innovator.” I ignore anything subjective that an applicant writes about herself, because so many people’s self-assessments are wildly inaccurate and I don’t yet know enough about the candidate to have any idea if hers is reliable or not.

Exactly.  It’s just like when they say “Objection, your honor! Hearsay!” in the movies.  Accomplishments – that’s hard results and benefits because of something you did - are objective.  Your opinion is subjective and carries no weight.  That’s another one of the many reasons you send out resumes and hear nothing back.

Your resume should answer one key question.
The vast majority of resumes I see read like a series of job descriptions, listing duties and responsibilities at each position the job applicant has held. But resumes that stand out do something very different. For each position, they answer the question: What did you accomplish in this job that someone else wouldn’t have?

Again….exactly.  Between the person who had the job before you and the person who will have the job after you, and you….the job will be done 3 different ways.  Factor in the hundreds of thousands of people in the US who have your job title, and you have an infinitely large number of different performances.  How many CFOs do you think there are in the US?  Do you think they are all doing the same job the same way with the same results? Of course not.

New grads need work experience.
I receive all too many resumes from recent grads who have literally no work experience: nothing, not internships, not temp jobs, nothing at all. Find a way to get actual work experience before you leave school. Do internships every semester you are able, so that you have experience on your resume. Paid, unpaid, whatever it takes. If a part-time job of a few hours a week is all you have time for outside of your classes, that’s fine. Do that. No one will hire you? Find work experience as a volunteer—that counts too

It provides an indication of how self motivated and responsible you are.

We think a lot about your personality
You might not get hired because your working style would clash with the people you’d be working with. Often, one personality type will simply fit better into a department than another will, and that’s the kind of thing that’s very difficult (if not impossible) for a candidate to know. Remember, it’s not just a question of whether you have the skills to do the job, it’s also a question of fit for this particular position, with this particular boss, in this particular culture, in this particular company.

Kind of like dating.  If you like Michael Buble, drive the speed limit, and like to watch old movies, do you really want to date someone who likes Metallica at top volume, gets into testing the centrifugal force effects on the road, and prefers to stay up late going dancing at clubs?

We want you to talk in interviews, but be concise.
There’s always at least one otherwise-qualified candidate in any hiring round who kills their chances by being too long-winded. You might think, “Well, some people are long-winded, but it doesn’t mean he wouldn’t do a good job.” The problem is that, at a minimum, it signals that you’re not good at picking up on conversational cues, and raises doubts about your ability to organize your thoughts and convey needed information quickly.

I interrupt a lot of my clients and freely admit it and explain why to them.  And it comes up when we talk about interview skills.  Lots of  candidates find interviewing gets easier after they’ve done it a few times.  Even as a recruiter I suggested role playing.  Formulate your thoughts and sentences and get the practice runs out of the way before hand.  Ask your friends and family if you have any quirks (like endlessly talking) so you can stimulate your self awareness and make an effort to overcome it/them.  Not just for the interview, but maybe even in general!

Be honest in interviews, but don’t spill about a bad boss
You’re far better off explaining that you’re looking for new challenges, excited about this particular opportunity, taking the time to find something right, and so forth. I’m not crazy about advising someone to be anything less than forthright, and I don’t normally recommend it, but in this area, the potential for giving an employer an bad impression is just too great to do it safely.

It’s tough to do.  I’ve been able to give some clients wording in conjunction with what they’re looking for, but it takes specific knowledge of the instance.  By and large, she’s correct.  Don’t even attempt to explain it.   Because it’s a one-sided story, you may come off like you’re playing the blame-game (which means you might have a hard time accepting responsiblity for your actions) and on occasion, people sense they’re sticking their foot in their mouth, and then in an effort to take it out, make the situation worse.

Copyrighted, U.S.News & World Report, L.P. All rights reserved

this decision makes me ill

June 18th, 2010 by Judi

unemployedFirst, I want to lay some ground work.

Having been a recruiter for 22 years (which is straight commission sales), with a lot of repeat clients, and having always been a top producer, I know a thing or two about sales.  I know a thing or two about the psychology of people, too.  These are two of the things that differentiate me from so many other career coaches, and thus allows me to be struggling through the expansion  that I am.

I’ve long discussed the two types of companies and their differences.  I’ve also taught why and how hiring authorities default to “No,” and how to get around that in the job seeking process.   Learning and understanding that is partially why so many of my clients have found jobs, not easily, but quickly.

And now this.  Stupidity.  A prime example of one of the two types of companies and an even more emphatic reason why the factors I talk about must be put into play before you start your search.

You know what I’d like to say  to these companies and those who made this decision? “There but for the grace of God, go you, you idiots.”

Thank goodness for companies like these.  Recruiters love them.  Companies like this are often the first place to be raided because of their pervasive attitude that manifests itself in so many other ways.

I’d also like to ask them “You couldn’t think of any new way to screen?  Is your business built on such arbitrary decisions?  Does your withdrawing this requirement when asked about it by the media give you any clue at all about the requirement you’ve just implemented?”

What am I talking about? 

Thompson said he also thinks ruling out the unemployed is a bad idea. But he said that part of the problem is that recruiters and human resource departments are being overwhelmed with applications for any job opening that is posted. So they’re looking for any short-cuts to get the list of applicants to consider down to a more manageable size.

Is there a way around this?  Sure.  There are about 5 ways I can think of right off the top of my head.  I totally see why this is happening, what the obvious repercussions are for those who are unemployed, and why it makes understanding the psychology and behavioral thinking process of these people all that more important if you want to get around it. 

For two years now, “good enough” hasn’t been.  You’ve needed to be “cutting edge.”  Now that’s not only more important, you better be razor sharp, and learn this skill called job seeking like your life depended on it.  Because it looks like it might.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Outofwork-job-applicants-told-cnnm-3498252371.html?x=0

a closer look at job advice: the good, the bad, and the ugly

June 8th, 2010 by Judi

good, bad, uglyONE – ugly
I’m working on a national publicity campaign, and I was talking with a guy who runs multiple national trade shows.  We were talking about some of the books he receives that people want him to promote.  He said (more or less), “Most aren’t worth the paper they’re written on.  What makes some speaker think they know about how to get a job, I don’t know.  They’re only capitalizing on the market needs.”  Caveat emptor, you know?

Here’s a good example.  This guy has authored over 55 books.  He’s a national motivational speaker. He’s an exec on a major pro sports team.  All good stuff – and definitely credible.  He’s written a book called “Nail It! Top Ten Secrets for Winning the Job Interview.”  A few of his secrets:

Being prepared.  Exuding self confidence. Display professionalism.  Radiate energy and enthusiasm. Reveal your creativity.  Did anyone not know these types of things were important?  No  word on what types of questions you’ll be asked, what they mean, or what they’re looking for or any insight into the psychological or sales aspects of addressing them.  Caveat emptor!

TWO – bad
A job seeker in one of the LinkedIn groups responded to the this question: what do I put in the online applications that ask me for my desired salary?
“Just put $1 if ‘Negotiable’ isn’t available. It will be an item on their ‘To Ask’ list and hopefully you can get a better understanding of what they are looking for from your conversation if they don’t offer a salary range.”

Don’t do that.  They’re not going to ask you because they’re not going to bring you in.  You’re going to be jettisoned for being flip.   Assuming you’re interviewing in the same line as what you’ve been doing, then the salary range is roughly in the same area as what you’ve been making.  Put what you’re making now.

THREE – good
Ten Commandments for Better Networking – an article written by Dr. Ivan Misner, who is the founder and chairman of BNI, the world’s largest business networking organization.  His latest book, Networking Like A Pro, is probably very good because….it’s something he knows and it’s what he does.  The article offers very good advice in brief, digestible paragraphs.
http://www.careerrocketeer.com/2010/05/10-commandments-for-better-networking.html

bad credit? employer credit check? no worries!

May 18th, 2010 by Judi Perkins

bad creditIn addition to drug testing and often fingerprinting, companies both national and international have also required credit checks.  But it’s become more the norm than the exception, because with the extreme number of people applying, companies have implemented it as a means of indicating a candidate’s character.

Unfortunately for the many who have been out of work so long they’ve destroyed their credit, a credit check strikes fear in their hearts.  What if the company rescinds the job offer?  It becomes a catch-22.  You can’t repair your credit without a job, and you can’t get a job without good credit.

The solution for some candidates is to confess immediately.  This results in eliminating them from consideration, which perpetuates their fear.  To make the credit check issue virtually non-existent and remove the fear from the entire equation, let’s factor in some basic psychology.

As humans, we have the inclination to rationalize what we want.  The more something is of value to us, the more we exclude from the picture anything that might impede our ability to obtain it.  When you apply this to the hiring situation, it means that a job seeker, about to receive an offer, has value to the company.  Consequently, the candidate’s bad credit becomes relatively unimportant to them. 

By contrast, when you confess in your cover letter, you’re guaranteed not to hear from the company.  When you admit to it during your first interview, you’ve just screened yourself out.  Early in the process the company is still looking for reasons eliminate candidates.  When you confess to having bad credit you’re not getting points for honesty; you’re shooting yourself in the foot.

Factoring in additional psychology, most people don’t like surprises, certainly companies about to extend an offer.  When you combine the relative degree of value with the effect of being surprised, the solution becomes much easier: tell them about your credit, but not until they’re about to extend and offer and consequently do the credit check.  You have value to them, and you’ve removed the surprise.  The result? The whole matter is brushed aside.

When an offer is imminent, there are phrases that will clue you in.   To begin with, you’re generally aware of when you’re in the final stages of the process, if not when you’re the final candidate.  The interviewers tend to smile a lot and say positive statements that join you both together.  Or they request references.  Failing that, they’ll make you an offer and expect you to take a few days to consider it.  Now’s the time to bring it up. 

Another tip:  what you say and how you say it influences how the information is received.  In other words, the bigger the deal you make of it, the more attention they’ll give it.  When you share the information with a smile, and in an informative, but off-handed way, you’re communicating that it’s no big deal. 

Wording would be something like, “By the way, I want to let you know that during the long period I was unemployed and juggling my bills, I ruined my credit.  Since you’ll be doing a credit check, will my temporary bad credit be a problem?” 

Yet more psychology: notice the inclusion of the word temporary, as well as the explanation for the bad credit.  You’re satisfying their unspoken question of “why?’ which is likely to put them on edge about the subject, and at the same time, you’re telling them that it’s not the normal state of affairs. All they really want to know is that you’re responsible and not a constant excuse maker. 

Bad credit and bankruptcy are usually accompanied by mitigating circumstances such as lengthy unemployment or an irresponsible spouse and divorce proceedings.  We’re human.  Companies understand this because they’re composed of humans.  So instead of losing sleep, remember that by the time the credit check happens, they’re more concerned about getting you on board.